Nota Feedback Friday

I have read about half the essays, pretty happy so far 😉 Please review this and answer the questions below.

For an essay on drama, you MUST write a paragraph on each of the below and use it to answer the question.

If you don´t discuss the language that Arthur Miller uses, you CANNOT get more than a 5,4, as stated in the markscheme (which you received in paper form, we talked about in class, AND is available on my blog.)

Plot/Context

Setting/Mood/ Intrigue, tension and suspense

Characterisation (how the character IS/development)

Dramatic Irony

Themes

 

Nota question:

Re-read from ‘Chris: Sometimes you infuriate me, you know that?’ (Page 15) To ‘Keller: Yeah. I can see that.’ (Page 18)

What does Miller make you feel about Keller and Chris at this moment in the play? Support your answer with details from the text.

Tips:

  • Plan your answer thoroughly before you begin writing. Spend at least 15 minutes planning.
  • Open with an introduction and close with a conclusion whilst following a point, evidence, explain formula for the body of your script.
  • Embed quotations.
  • Use paragraphs.

 

Perfect Introduction, taken from Santiago Videla´s essay (well done btw)

In the play ‘All My Sons’ Arthur Miller manipulates the audience´s feelings by using different writing techniques to describe and contrast Joe and Chris, the main characters of the play. These techniques are plot and context, setting and mood, characterization, irony and language and themes.

 

Context

Miller´s play is modern realism. He tries to describe his characters as realistic as possible and put them in normal situations with everyday problems and conflict. Miller creates a ´mirror´ that reflects normal life, to make the audience feel more attached to the characters. He shows that common people are as important as royalty and famous figures.

After two second world wars and a great depression. The characters have lived through this. Audience can relate to them. The characters problems mirror their own and the audience become involved in the characters.

Ideal of the American dream.

The USA was two times richer after the second world war = survivor´s guilt.

 

Setting

Surrounded by trees, symbolism because Joe wants to hide secrets.

In the backyard of the house, where people act like who they really are.

Play takes place in one place only. Audience is focused on the dialogue and what little action there is. Audience have to ‘read between the lines’ to understand what will happen next. Can argue that the start of the play is deliberately boring. Beginning of tension.

 

Plot

In act 1, pg 15, Chris said, “Sometimes you infuriate me, you know that?…. I gotta ignore.” The plot of the extract describes father and son in a serious discussion. This is the first time we see the two characters talking alone together. Tension and conflict we did not see before.

 

Miller uses the plot to create foreshadowing. Foreshadowing is the conflict that we now see between father and son… maybe it will get worse.

Foreshadowing builds tension  = play is more interesting

 

The plot is a tragedy and Joe is a tragic hero, this is the anticipation stage before it begins to go wrong for the tragic hero.

 

Mood

Comparatively tense atmosphere compared to before.

 

Characterisation

In this extract, where the two characters argue Miller shows how different Chris and Joe really are.

They stand for two different philosophies = self interest of Joe and social responsibility of Chris. These philosophies divide them in the end.

Joe believes in the American dream, but not at the cost of other people.

Chris and Joe have a believable father-son relationship.

 

Language

Realistic dialogue to reflect real problems, the characters seem very realistic so the audience can relate to them.

Joe says hell twice, betrays his anxiety, this would have been a really bad swear word in 1947.  Chris never uses this word against his dad.

 

Dramatic Irony

dramatic irony = gives the audience additional information.

keeps the audience interested.

“You have such a talent for ignoring things.”

“the whole shooting match” (Chris is the one who went to fight, not Joe.)

We realize it is dramatic irony later because at this point we do not know that Joe was responsible for the faulty bombs. Miller creates a ´fake´ good Joe which makes his revelation at the end all the more shocking.

 

Themes:

Social Responsibility

Truth

 

Underline what you missed.

 

Write your name here ______________________

 

All My Sons Questions

Please answer in your copy books.

 

  1. Do you think the world is divided into honest suckers (Steve Deevers) and dishonest winners (Joe Kellers)?
  2. Does Miller believe people are fundamentally good or bad?
  3. Do you think Larry’s suicide was an act of courage? What about Joe’s? Is suicide ever an act of courage?
  4. Drawing from people in your life, cast All My Sons. (You don’t have to tell them, especially if its not so flattering.)
  5. Do you think this play would work if it was updated to the 21st century? Why or why not?

 

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s